West Sussex County Council redundancy reserves run dry after job cuts

Cash reserves earmarked for voluntary redundancy payments by West Sussex County Council are 'near exhaustion', adding to serious financial pressures on the authority, a select committee meeting was told.

The county council has already made hundreds of staff redundant, as part of a major review of services aimed at reducing its budget by 50m over the next two years.

On top of this, services have been asked to reduce spending by 5m in the current financial year, partly to counter risks of overspending in adults' and children's services.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The situation over reserves for redundancy payments has already been reached although there are still five months to go before the end of the financial year.

No figures have yet been released by County Hall disclosing how much has been paid out, or how many staff have taken voluntary redundancy this year.

The county council's policy and resources select committee heard concerns about overspending were magnified because its total revenue reserves, from which any overspending at the end of the year would have to be covered, were at a relatively-low level.

Any overspending could take the reserves below the minimum level acceptable for the financial stability of the authority, or potentially could even wipe out the reserves completely.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A committee report also warned about the risks of 'severe reductions' in national public spending.

Cllr Irene Richards, chairman of the adults' services select committee, said 'loads of staff' had been lost in home care services.

Adults' services was the second-biggest spender among county services, and was taking some of the 'biggest hits' in the service review.

"It impacts upon the greater part of the population of West Sussex," she added.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The policy and resources select committee was told savings of 20m were planned for next year as a result of the service review, and 30m the year after.

Cllr Peter Jones said he was concerned about the problems the county council could face if these savings were delayed in coming through.

He added: "Are we wise to go forward with a 2.5 per cent increase on council tax at this stage rather than turning round and saying all our cupboards are bare '“ the redundancy cupboard is bare, and the revenue reserves are at an unhealthy low."

The possible knock-on effect of not achieving the savings should be considered.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Cllr Louise Goldsmith, cabinet member for finance and resources, said an ambitious target was being set, but this reflected what residents expected of them.

"The expectation of residents is good service and low council tax," she added.

Everyone was in a difficult economic situation, but they were trying to achieve the targets, and a 2.5 per cent tax increase.

"I don't have any issue in asking officers to meet challenging targets," she declared.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

They were well on the way to achieving the 20m savings target for next year. And she believed additional savings would be found as the work went on.

What do you think? Send a letter to [email protected] or leave a comment below.

Click here to go back to Chichester news

Click here to go back to Bognor Regis news

Click here to go back to Midhurst and Petworth news

To tell us where in the world you are reading this story click here to add yourself to our readers' map.